|
It was depressing at times, there's almost a sense of despair to it. When Tomas meets and falls in love with Teresa, she is pulled into his world of infidelity and lies. I really enjoyed the first half of this book.
According to his rule he can only either see a woman three consecutive times and then never again, or once every three months indefinitely. It's the kind of book that needs to be discussed. The Unbearable Lightness of Being came recommended to me by several book bloggers. Set in Prague, it's a story about a divorced man named Tomas, who after leaving his wife and child decides to become a womanizer. Teresa and Tomas marry, and she puts up with his cheating ways. I couldn't help but feel sorry for her, being in love with a man who could not stop being unfaithful to her, I kept hoping she would find the strength to free herself from him.
When I was done reading and closed the book, I just kind of sat back and thought on it. When Tomas, Teresa, Sabin and Franz stories were done being told, my attention was captured. Towards the second half of the book, it becomes more about Communism and secret spies, that's when I began to really get bored. The writing in this book was wonderful and sad, that's what I enjoyed most about it. Tomas has a long time mistress, an artist named Sabin, who herself is having an affair with another married man, Franz. Not that that's a boring topic, but I wasn't expecting the story to take that direction. He has casual sex, 'erotic relationships' he calls them, and makes a rule of 'threes'.
But then the narrator goes back and elaborates a bit on each character, adding more details, which I found a bit boring at times. My favorite character was Teresa. This way, nobody falls in love. As the story unfolds, you get to see different perspectives from these four characters.
It has ragged pages, so it was absolutely unsuitable as a gift for my friend. The book came in a disappointing condition.
particular clip from the movie on youtube.If this interests you then you might like the book too. Promiscuous to the extent of transforming into inert pleasure.Philosophical to the extent of becoming irrational.I believe my affinity for complex relationships is what prompted me to read this book.The plot is set in Prague and incorporates details about the general lives of intellectuals during the communist regime.The author discusses lightness vs heaviness in terms of our existence and wonders if these two can be attributed to life.He further argues that since we live only one life there is no way of comparing our decisions and hence it is inevitable that we cannot find meaning.The story connects the lives of Thomas - a surgeon who has an insatiable desire to deconstruct everything abstruse.He is an incorrigible lover who ceases to love when he interprets the obscurity.He falls in love with Tereza - a photographer and considers his falling as a series of coincidence.He loves her immensely but Tereza always carries the heavy load of his infidelities.Thomas's mistress Sabrina on the other hand, treats her relationship with Thomas nonchalantly and is free of vexations.She is portrayed as the one who leads a light life.Like Thomas she has various lovers but is cold and detached.She is an intelligent artist who abhors kitsch and is constantly expressing her loathing towards the Russian socialist through her paintings.Franz an idealist and a professor, is a lover of Sabrina and is abandoned by her on the pretext of being predictable.Finally Tereza's dog Karenin brings Thomas and her together during his painful battle against cancer.One of my most favorite scene from the book is the dance sequence towards the very end where Thomas and Tereza are celebrating.I was surprised to find [.].
Shame really, and the reader can feel for Franz when the ideal comes crashing down around him. And that is why I love foreign translations. It's about a connection, and in The Unbearable Lightness of Being, readers should have no trouble making a connection, cultural or otherwise. Tereza is a special character in this story as she is the only character where we have full access to her subconscious mind. The most monumental of them all being when Tomas likens the Czech Communists to Oedipus.
Tereza really doesn't understand that Tomas truly loves her, and this is one of many misunderstandings Kundera opens up for discussion in the novel. We are allowed to experience it not through the eyes of a journalist or a tourist, but through the eyes of a true witness. Tereza's oppression in life manifests itself in these photos and in dreams of death, actually dreams of execution, for she is no more than a burden, a weak pitiful soul and one who Tomas feels obligated to take care of. For Tomas, Sabina is the manifest expression of one's subconscious desires, which is in stark contrast to his own nature. Kundera here allows us to psychoanalyze Tereza through her dreams, which are very disturbing. Here he finds that the courage of his convictions is nothing more than fallacy. She is ashamed of her body and feels disconnected and unworthy of her own soul, so she never condemns Tomas for his infidelities, instead preferring to suffer as a martyr in silence.
Tomas is an unrepentant womanizer. Love he reserves for his wife, Tereza.Tereza comes to Tomas a wounded bird, a symbolic image we see later in the story. Franz's wife and daughter are social sycophants, and his life outside of Sabina disgusts him, so Sabina makes logical sense to him. So, Karenin, to me, represented true freedom, purity of spirit, and the opposite of oppression. In this case, seeing the movie doesn't count.The story, taking place in the Prague Spring of the Russian occupation of Czechoslovakia in 1968, tackles a lot of heavy subject matter, and the major theme, at least how I saw it, was oppression: the oppression of love, marriage, sex, family, war, religion, and the communist regime. Equally disturbing is the dissident photojournalism Tereza becomes preoccupied with early in her marriage: Prostitutes and Russian tanks.
Kundera talks a lot about religion in these final pages, specifically man's dominion over beast, and he makes it clear that our translation of that proclamation is a bit misguided. Franz takes another lover -- a homely student of his -- although he continues to pine for Sabina, and he proceeds to live as an outcast, fallen from grace until he decides on a whim for the first time in his life to actually participate in a political march from Thailand to Cambodia. This self-discovery by proxy plays out again in the interactions Tomas has later with his estranged son.Our fourth character is Franz: Sabina's lover after Tomas. He promptly confesses his indiscretions to his wife and leaves her only to find that Sabina had already made up her mind to leave him, and leave she did -- disappeared from his life in a breath. Over the holidays I finished reading this book, which is one of the finest existentialist novels of all time, originally published in French and then in the author's native Czech.
The beasts were not thrown out of Eden. Each of the main characters is oppressed in their own way by their own ideals, philosophies, and their own idiosyncratic view of the world. "He gave birth to two rolls and a bee."One can appreciate this novel on so many levels, technically for the non-linear plotline, the various points of view represented -- political, theological, and philosophical -- and the third person omniscient narrative that is biased to the core so we can appreciate the direct interjection by the narrator who never once attempts to hide that he is the author. During the ensuing interrogations, we get a true taste of Tomas' convictions, and in that, we the reader, can find it within our boundaries to put our faith in Tomas' love for Tereza, no matter his actions to the contrary.Then we have Sabina -- Tomas' favourite mistress -- the artistic anarchist who finds satisfaction in the act of betrayal. Tomas and Tereza both, in the end and in their own ways, come to realize Karenin's significance, as will the reader, no doubt. Kundera's passion for his characters is duly noted in one of many interjections by the author directly into the narrative.
She has declared war on everything in her life that she considers "kitsch" including her privileged puritan ancestry and Socialists. It's not just about different scenery. During a sexual epiphany, he feels confident that Sabina has fallen in love with him as well. So by this perspective -- the devout appreciator of a woman's unique sexual identity -- his adulterous escapades have become justified explorations of humanity. Much like Winnie the Poo, Karenin was happiness in life simplified: routine, devotion, and unconditional love without selfish motivation or personal prejudice.
Our story beings with Tomas, a Czech surgeon and intellectual. Again here, the oppression of her marriage juxtaposed against the oppression of the occupying regime is portrayed very skilfully by Kundera. This is another book I am ashamed to admit I didn't get around to reading until now. He is a kind and compassionate man, but a life of books and academia, sans all visceral experience, have left him devoid of the great kindness and the great compassion he aspires to, not to mention: the great love. He feels no love for these women; his only aim is to metaphorically dissect the essence of their being. She is a gentle soul, though neurotic to the enth degree from a childhood of oppression at the hands of her mother.
Sabina is not a liberal nor is she even one iota romantically inclined, but this doesn't stop Franz from placing her on a pedestal. Sadly, Franz falls in love with Sabina, not for who she really is but for what he idealizes her to be: a romantically tragic Czech dissident. The way Kundera blends all these elements effortlessly into the lives of just a few interconnected people is sublime. His conquests are many, but each situation -- each woman -- has something unique to her womanhood, and that uniqueness is like a secret, one that can only be revealed during the act of sex. How could he not. This part of the story was really heart wrenching, and I fell to tears many times over the course of the Karenin chapters. A man of delusion returns to reality.Lastly, and my personal favourite character in the entire novel: Karenin, the faithful canine companion to Tomas and Tereza.
"Here lies Karenin." His tombstone says. Franz is a learned man, a professor and an idealist to self-destructive proportions. In addition to the very human story of relationships gone astray, we are allowed the privilege of experiencing that moment in Czech history where the country had lost its will and its identity.
To Tomas, Sabina is the singing, soaring bird of freedom, and Tereza, the injured crow on the verge of death. At the heart of it, it is an essay about the human condition, but its scope is much broader in that it dissects, much as Tomas would have, the unique effects various forms of oppression have on that condition. His philosophical view is that sex and love are two distinct affairs with little contradiction between them.
Here, the man of long wanderings will return to where he never felt he belonged. Tomas seeks to expose in others that which he cannot express in himself, so in Sabina, he finds the self he will never truly know. She perceives herself as weak.
It was an unintentional comparison, but Tomas would still suffer greatly for it at the hands of the Communist propaganda machine.
Over time, though, Kundera's voice starts to ware away at the essence of the book, because he takes such a condescending view on his characters. Having watched this as a movie many years ago, I finally picked up the book. I enjoyed the first half and was able to focus on the story, and consider some of the more philosophical observations.
|
